Categories
Commentary Uncategorized

Should I Fear Storms With Names?

1300018002814318693.png
They said it, not me.

For the past three years, The Weather Channel has adopted a widely criticized advertising strategy of giving names to winter storms.  They’re not doing it to make you safer, or even to make it simpler to take about storms. What they want to do is get you talking about these storms and, more importantly, clicking on links to their web pages. Why? Because no respectable meteorological organization uses, or even acknowledges, those names.  So, when you hear that a winter storm called Lovemuffin is “bearing down on the east coast,” for example, then google “Lovemuffin” you’re going to end up at a Weather Channel site–or a cooperating site that is financially connected to the Weather Channel. Heck, they register these names as proprietary. In essence, they’ve found a way to “own” the news.

Even worse, in order to drive interest in their sites, the Weather Channel adopts a hyperbolic reporting posture. Every storm becomes the potential storm to end all storms, every squall threatens to become a blizzard, every blizzard the fresh dawn of a new ice age. Accompanying stories urge us to take measures that may increase our chances of survival–make sure your shovel is solid, buy flashlight batteries and candles, extra toilet paper, rent some movies, load up the shopping cart with Diet Coke and Oreo cookies.

Fortunately, they have not gone unopposed. A Facebook page, called STOP The Weather Channel From Naming Winter Storms–It’s Stupid emerged to challenge this scourge, and plenty of news articles, commentary, and essays have likewise pointed out the ridiculous and cynical nature of the Weather Channel’s ploy. Accuweather has spoken against the naming  storms, and the National Weather Service has refused to acknowledge the storm names.

In the mean time, it is difficult to know, without carefully inspecting every weather report for its sourcing, just how we should react. Is there really a horrifying, dangerous storm on the way, or is a media outlet just trying to keep their ratings up? And then, when that turns out to be the case, when do we pay the price after so much crying wolf, when will we become so immune to the hysteria that we fail to heed the warning–and how many will pay the price?

I put a million links up there–a million, count ’em–as references, but this essay is particularly interesting and enlightening.

Categories
Uncategorized

They Named Some Shoes After Me

I wore Chuck Taylors in the summers for many years, ostensibly as a retro counter-fashion Old Scans_536bthing in the nascent age of overwrought athletic shoes, but the truth was that the first pair I got was $9.95 and just about all we could afford.  I remember being outraged in 1991, when I finally refused to cough up $23.99 for a pair of court shoes that offered no ankle or arch support when I could get a good pair of ugly leather seconds for about the same price.  These clearly don’t cost $9.95, but they are named after me.  Cool, huh?  Click the link below to see the Junk Chuck Sneakers.

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.163799430494143.1073741832.158704147670338&type=3

Categories
link video

Can We Auto-Correct Humanity?

I try to use social media to augment my life, rather than dictate it. It’s been easy cutting way back on facebook, twitter fries my brain, and it is my intention to be the second to last person on the planet without a smart phone.  My wife will be the actual last.